»Ê¹ÚÌåÓýappÏÂÔØ

Image credit: ¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§

¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§

Rated: Good

price:
$$$$

location: Australia

¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§ sustainability rating

Planet

4 out of 5

People

5 out of 5

Animals

4 out of 5

Overall rating: Good

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great)


Our “Planetâ€� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§ “Goodâ€�. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses some lower-impact materials including upcycled materials.
  • It follows a slow fashion model such as limited production runs and seasonless products.
  • It uses low-impact dyes in all of its products.
  • It uses compostable packaging.

Workersâ€� rights are central to our “Peopleâ€� rating, which assesses brandsâ€� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§ “Greatâ€�. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It traces most of its supply chain.
  • It visits its suppliers regularly.
  • There's no evidence it has a Code of Conduct but it has a formal statement covering workersâ€� rights.
  • It partners with women artisans or women-owned enterprises.
  • It ensures workers in the final production stage are paid a living wage, but not throughout its entire supply chain.

Brandsâ€� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animalsâ€� rating. Here we rate ¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§ “Goodâ€�. It doesn’t appear to use animal-derived materials but doesn’t claim to be a vegan brand.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ¸éŪ±Ê´¡±á´¡±«³§ “Goodâ€� overall.

Last updated 2025-06-18